More About This Website


"Give me your tired, your poor

Your huddled masses yearning to breathe free

The wretched refuse of your teeming shore

Send these, the homeless, tempest-toss'd to me

I lift my lamp beside the Golden Door."

Hundreds of Oregon Corporations Escape the Minimum Tax


Half of the US Is Broke


The myth of the Christian country


“The test of our progress is not whether we add more to the abundance of those who have much; it is whether we provide enough for those who have too little.”

FDR, 2nd Inaugural Address, Jan 20, 1937


Middle East friendship chart


Corporations enriching shareholders


Facts not fiction on universal gun background checks



"Injustice anywhere is injustice everywhere"

Letter from Birmingham Jail, April 16, 1963

Martin Luther King, Jr.

The GOP - Not One of US.

Wall Street, our new criminal class...       

   Business in the USA is sitting on $2 trillion dollars refusing to invest their own funds in expanding and hiring workers.  

   When one adds to this the reserves that banks, equity firms and hedge funds have - the picture is clear - "capitalism in the USA is on strike." 

   The engine of our economy - the spirit of entrepreneurship is not in evidence today.  So much for business being dynamic and risk taking. 

   They hire K- Street lobbyists and their ilk at the state level because they are averse to risk taking - pleading for tax breaks, tax credits and endless loopholes. 

   The "business of business" in America today is not about job creation, it's about wealth hoarding and redistribution from the middle class to the top 1%. 

   So for those who claim government doesn't create jobs, my response is that business doesn't either until given "corporate welfare" by government.  The fact is that the private and public sector are highly integrated, something the anti-tax, anti-government Tea Party types don't understand. 

   Job creation requires public/private partnerships but the benefits of such collaboration should go to the 99% not just the 1%.  





  • A Middle East View      

Rami G. Khouri

  • RealClearPolitics:


  • Jim Hightower:

  • Robert Reich:

Robert Reich

  • Thomas Friedman: 

Friedman Column

  • Nicholas Kristof: 

Kristof Column

Oregon's Motto: 

She flies with her own wings! 

Hard Times in Oregon: 


The Oregon story - the rich get richer, the poor and middle class lose ground.  Check this front page Oregonian article out. 

Oregon wage gap widens

Homelessness in Oregon - a call to action

Chuck Currie The crisis of homelessness


      Oregon's coming 34th out of 41 states in the Obama "Race to the Top" illustrates the failure of leadership from Governor Kitzhaber and his predecessors as they have built an educational bridge to nowhere called high stakes testing.

   Instead of being in a race to the top we seem to be dumpster diving to the bottom despite doing education reform since 1991.  Insanity is termed doing the same thing over and over again.  When can we put a fork in this stupidity? 

   To confuse matters more the Oregonian's editorial board has pontificated that this was a lost opportunity to get federal funding for innovation.  How firing principals and teachers equals innovation is a mystery to me.   

   The way to reform schools is to reduce class sizes, to encourage teacher collaboration and to support their continued education.  High stakes testing and performance based assessment of teachers are NOT the answer!    

   If you want students to succeed you first have to resolve the issues they confront before they come to school.  Children who face poverty, hunger, homelessness, health care issues and family instability require wrap around services for them and their families, 24/7.   

   Every child needs a safe home of their own and parents who know how to be good parents.   

There is only one way to address this impending crisis.  Schools must have a stable source of funding. Until that happens - we will limp from crisis to crisis.   




    Why does the richest nation in the world have the moral blight of homeless people?

Invisible People


    Connecting the dots between homelessness & hunger in Oregon and Washington County: 


•    The faces of the homeless are families with children, single men and women, vets, and many who are impaired. It is estimated that in Washington County up to 56% of homelessness occurs to families.


•    Hunger is highest among single mother households (10%) and poor families (15%) as well as renters, unemployed workers and minority households. 

     In Washington County, Oregon's "economic engine," the divide between the affluent and the working poor continues.  We have a 19,000 unit gap in affordable low income rental housing.  County political and business leaders are indifferent to this crisis...   
















































RAD Lines

See my FACEBOOK @ Russ


  • He lost by 2.9 million votes...

  • He's a con artist...

  • He's a pathological liar... 

  • He's a failed business man...

  • He's a fascist... 


Trump & The Mob


Trump's role models are Vladmir Putin and Benito Mussolini.  He has contempt for our checks and balances system.  He wants to "rule" not govern like a strong man, a despot.  He will shredd the Constitution anytime he feels the urge to do so and like all despots he only listens to his inner circle.  And he is paranoid and narcissistic. 


Hundreds of Oregon Corporations Escape the Minimum Tax


Half of the US Is Broke


The myth of the Christian country


Housing Needs in Oregon 




"There are men who believe that democracy... is limited or measured by a kind of mystical and artificial fate [and that] tyranny and slavery have become the surging wave of the future..." 

FDR, 3rd Inaugural Address, Jan 20, 1940

  • "Let me issue and control a nation's money and I care not who writes the laws." - Mayer Amschel Rothschild

  • Miguel de Cervantes, from The Duke - "I accuse you of being an idealist, a bad poet and an honest man."  Cervantes' response - "Guilty as charged, I have never had the courage to believe in nothing."   from Man of La Mancha  

Professor Kingfield, from the Paper Chase

   "I'm not a teacher: only a fellow traveler of whom you asked the way. I pointed ahead – ahead of myself as well as you." 

- George Bernard Shaw



From the Left Wing:

Paul Krugman

Paul Krugman - The New York Times

Democracy Now

The Daily Kos

Blue Oregon


"Children are made readers on the laps of their parents." 

- Emilie Buchwald 


    "Although we may never know with complete certainty the identity of the winner of this year’s Presidential election, the identity of the loser is perfectly clear. It is the Nation’s confidence in the judge as an impartial guardian of the rule of law." 

- Justice John Paul Stevens, Bush v. Gore, 2001

    The state of our union - check out the map, it's a reality check for those who can't figure out why people are so ticked off... 



"Great is the guilt of an unnecessary war"

- John Adams

"Loyalty to country always.  Loyalty to government when it deserves it."  

- Mark Twain  

“Those who fail to learn from history are doomed to repeat it.”  

- George Santayana 

"The love of one's country is a natural thing.  But why should love stop at the border?" 

- Pablo Casals

"Things fall apart; the centre cannot hold; mere anarchy is loosed upon the world, the blood-dimmed tide is loosed, and everywhere the ceremony of innocence is drowned; the best lack all conviction, while the worst are full of passionate intensity." 

- William Butler Yeats  


"You see things; and you say, 'Why?' 

But I dream things that never were; and I say, "Why not?"  

- George Bernard Shaw, "Back to Methuselah" (1921) 

"...the most common and durable source of factions has been the various and unequal distribution of property. Those who hold and those who are without property have ever formed distinct interests in society...  The regulation of these various and interfering interests forms the principal task of modern legislation, and involves the spirit of party and faction in the necessary and ordinary operations of the government..."  

- James Madison, Federalist Papers #11 

"Why … should we have government? Why not each individual take to himself the whole fruit of his labor, without having any of it taxed away?”   

The legitimate object of government, is to do for the people whatever they need to have done, but which they can not do, at all, or can not do, so well, for themselves – in their separate and individual capacities … There are many such things … roads, bridges and the like; providing for the helpless young and afflicted; common schools … the criminal and civil [justice] departments."    

- Abraham Lincoln 

Taxes are the price we pay for a civilized society  

- Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr. 

"Parliament is not a congress of ambassadors from different and hostile interests, which interests each must maintain, as an agent and advocate, against other agents and advocates, but Parliament is a deliberative assembly of one nation, with one interest, that of the whole..." 

- Edmund Burke  

“It is a maxim among these lawyers that whatever hath been done before may legally be done again, and therefore they take special care to record all the decisions formerly made against common justice and the general reason of mankind.  These, under the name of precedents, they produce as authorities, to justify the most iniquitous opinions.”  

- Jonathan Swift 

A RAD rhetorical question - Were Madison & Marx "Marxists"?  


"History records that the money changers have used every form of abuse, intrigue, deceit, and violent means possible to maintain their control over governments."   

- James Madison




















































     Too many Americans see the 4th of July as a time to enjoy a baseball game, a family picnic, or exploding firecrackers not as a time for reflection. 

     We forget that our nation was born out of acts of repression and violence.  While most of us feel the "good guys" won, they forget the toll was accepting slavery, the attempted eradication of Native Americans and the acceptance of the role of women as second class chattel. We've come a long way since 1776 mostly for the good but not without great sacrifices from every generation since then. 

     And we face a new evil, the rise of home grown authoritarianism -

     In the age of Trumpism - the new authoritarianism - we need a rebirth of the American Dream not one framed by the idea of "what's good for corporate America, is good for Americans" but one framed by a new humanism that does not calculte your work or lack thereof as the measure of what it means to be human.
     Our humanity is how we treat others, especially the most vulnerable of us - children, the poor, the other.  The measure of our value is the bigness of our heart not the size of our wallet.
     The philosopher Henry Giroux offers an alternative vision of what needs to be done but I find it long on critical analysis and short on next steps.  But his conclusion gives us the glimpse of what progressives need to work for - a guaranteed national income not connected to work but as a fundamental human right.
Fighting back against the right's politics of exclusion can be a path toward rebuilding American democracy

     When a coal miner in West Virginia, a logger in Oregon, or a Detroit auto worker loses their job - they and their family should be sheltered from the crushing reality of what it means to be without a paycheck. 
     Trump can promise coal miners jobs but those jobs will not return anymore than the logging jobs in Oregon have returned.  We have a very different economy that no amount of tweeting from the Oval Office can change.  
     If we solve this problem along with going to a single payer health care system - then people can focus on what's really important - reinventing themselves by going back to school, raising their kids, helping in their community.  

     On this basis Red and Blue voters should be united - that nobody deserves to be economically marginalized - by losing a job, their health care and/or their home.  This concept has had bi-partisan support since the McGovern/Nixon election campaign in 1972 but it got little attention due to the Watergate scandal.  

     We don't have to reinvent the wheel.  We simply have to decide whether we invest in Americans or machines.  Let's begin by realizing we are not defined by our "work."   I'm a husband, a father, a grandfather, a once professor now unpaid pundit, blogger and citizen activist. I'm also reading books for pleasure again - what a concept.  
     Since leaving the workforce in 2009 I've reinvented myself many times in ways I never imagined. I also used to play bogey golf.  But I could do none of these things without the safety net of a pension plan I paid into for over 40 years, social security and a savings account. 
     Most Americans living paycheck to paycheck or by piling up credit card debt don't have that luxury today.  A guaranteed national income plus single payer health care will shelter millions American against the brutal facts of an economy that regards them as 'expendable'. Only then will they have the "luxury" to determine what they really want to do when they grow up!   


     For more on this topic -



     Editor's Note:  The key the winning elections is knowing how to count the votes.  This turns out to be more complicated than one might think as Hedrick Smith dissects recent off-year congressional races.  Elections are as much about design as turnout.  

Hedrick Smith

June 26, 2017

     Washington – The key takeaway from the super-heated battle for Georgia’s 6th Congressional district, where Republican veteran Karen Handel beat Democratic neophyte Jon Ossoff, is that partisan gerrymandering is king. It swings elections more powerfully and reliably than a flood of MegaMoney.

     Democrats and their supposedly “independent” Super-PACS turned this special election into the most expensive House race in U.S. political history. Flexing their financial muscle, Democrats poured a war chest of $39.2 million into the race, heavily outspending the still potent $24.8 million on the Republican side. But all that Democratic money went for naught. But why?


Republicans Karen Handel (R-GA) and Ralph Norman (R-SC) boosted to victory in special elections by gerrymandered districts.

     As they poked through the ashes of defeat, disgruntled Democrats blamed their previously youth-hero candidate, 30-year-old Jon Ossoff for too thin a resume or for not residing inside his election district. Or they sniped at late-breaking TV images of the shooting of Congressional Republicans by a Democratic malcontent. Or they carped that House Democratic leader Nancy Pelosi and her “San Francisco values” had undercut Ossoff in  among tradition-minded Georgia voters.

     But the pundits forgot the fundamentals – that Georgia’s sixth district had been engineered by the Republican Party’s gerrymander map-makers in 2001 and again in 2011 to guarantee victory for Republican candidates and defeat for Democrats.

How Red Map Has Given Republicans “A Lock”

     Amidst the finger-pointing and handwringing, political soothsayers ignored the obvious – that for four solid decades, Georgia’s sixth congressional district has been red, solid red, pure red, steadily red, loyally red, predictably red. In politics, that is called “a lock” – a safe political monopoly that has worked for the GOP in that district for 21 straight congressional elections.

     That lock was most recently the bounty of RedMap, the GOP’s stunningly successful campaign to capture control of as many state governments as possible in the 2010 elections. By picking up 675 legislative seats nationwide in 2010, Republicans won vital leverage in the wake of the 2010 census, when congressional seats were reapportioned and election district lines had to be redrawn.

     The RedMap sweep enabled Republicans to stack the mapping of election districts in the GOP’s favor in a string of states from Michigan, Ohio, Wisconsin and Pennsylvania to Virginia, Georgia, the Carolinas and Florida. Democrats did it, too in Maryland, Illinois and Massachusetts, but in far fewer states than Republicans.

     RedMap has paid off handsomely. It helped Republicans gain control of the House of Representatives in 2012 with a 33-seat majority even though Democratic candidates won 1.5 million more votes nationwide than Republicans. “Republicans derive a net benefit of at least 16-17 congressional seats in the current Congress” from partisan gerrymandering, says a new study from the nonpartisan Brennan Institute at New York University law school.

RedMap – Firewall vs. The Democrats

     What’s more, RedMap is the gift that keeps on giving. The sophisticated computer software used by the Republican mapmakers enabled the GOP to carve the boundaries of election districts with such precision that those GOP-drawn district maps now provide a firewall for Republican candidates in 2017 and beyond.

     Not just in Georgia, where Handel beat Ossoff, but next door in South Carolina where Republican Ralph Norman defeated Democrat Archie Parnell, by 51% to 47% in that state’s fifth district. Go back a decade and Democrats used to win that district easily, because they had drawn the maps in 2001.

     But when the 2010 census gave South Carolina one new House seat and the election maps were redrawn, the Republican legislature made sure that the fifth district was solidly Republican and and made it =easy for their man Mike Mulvaney to romp to victories in three elections. And last week, despite a strong challenge by Parnell, a pro-business Democrat with a Goldman Sachs pedigree, once again South Carolina’s fifth district worked like a charm as ”safe” Republican.

What Lured Democrats to Hope

     In Georgia, Democrats were lured into discounting the political laws of gravity by two electoral anomalies. In 2016, President Trump had only narrowly carried that district and since then, Trump had gone so far off the rails that they were tempted to believe that the highly educated district voters would punish any Republican candidate for Trump’s political sins. And second, Ossoff took everyone by surprise by finishing first among a bipartisan field of 18 candidates in the first April primary with 48% of the vote.

Democrats Jon Ossoff of Georgia, left, + Archie Parnell of South Carolina (right) faced uphill battles from the get go in districts gerrymandered by GOP.

     But in the runoff two months later, when both parties had time to mobilize their legions, turnout shot up from 193,000 to nearly 260,000. Ossoff was stuck at 48% of the vote. ”When turnout starts going up that high, and people start coming out of the woodwork to vote, it moves back to the (natural) alignment of the district,” commented Atlanta-based pollster Robert Cahaly.

     Natural alignment in Georgia’s sixth district, as in many other states, means gerrymandered alignment – stacked the way the majority party drew election district maps, picking reliable majorities of their own voters to keep themselves in power. 

The Historic pattern – Democratic for 134 years, Republican for 38

     Gerrymandering has a long history in American politics, dating back to 1812 and Democratic Governor Eldridge Gerry of Massachusetts. In Georgia, The Atlanta Constitution reported recently, Democrats created a lock on the sixth district in 1844 and dominated it for 134 years, except for a brief period during post-Civil War Reconstruction.

     But ever since 1978, when Newt Gingrich, then an upstart college professor, broke the Democratic lock by winning an open seat election, the Republicans have had their own monopoly in this district. Gingrich had one close-call election in 1990. But otherwise, he won a string of victories with majorities of 55% to 71%. In the last seven elections, former Rep. Tom Price always won with at least a 60% majority.

     Against that big built-in Republican tilt in Georgia and South Carolina, Democrats Jon Ossoff and Archie Parnell did strikingly well, but had little chance of winning. Democrats, now headed toward the 2018 mid-term elections and beyond, will once again face a slew of tough uphill battles against built-in Republican gerrymander advantages in at least 100 congressional districts.

     The partisan locks by both parties have triggered political rebellions among voters. In more than a dozen states, blatant party power politics have provoked grass roots reform movements seeking a more authentic choice for voters by turning over the job of drawing district lines to independent bipartisan commissions.

     Some Democratic voters in Wisconsin and Republican voters in Maryland have gone to court, challenging partisan gerrymandering as unconstitutional. In Wisconsin, a three-judge federal panel has  sided with the voters, finding that the majority party has diluted the value of their votes and outlawing partisan gerrymandering. In an uproar, Wisconsin’s Republican leadership has appealed and so partisan gerrymandering will go on trial before the Supreme Court this fall, with the potential for a wholesale upheaval in the landscape of American politics.



Update: This blog post has gotten more eyes than in months!  All politics is local - eh?   

Washiington County Chair Andy Duyck cites housing affordability as county's number one issue, especially with federal aid declining. 

Reader beware of a fox dressed in sheep's clothing or brain dead thinking at the helm - take your pick!  

PAMPLIN MEDIA GROUP PHOTO: PETER WONG - Andy Duyck, chair of the Washington County Board of Commissioners, said a poll showed 52 percent support for a countywide levy to increase affordable housing.

PAMPLIN MEDIA GROUP PHOTO: PETER WONG - Andy Duyck, chair of the Washington County Board of Commissioners, said a poll showed 52 percent support for a countywide levy to increase affordable housing.

Correction:  the poll showed a range of 53-57% in favor of such a levy. 


     Washington County Commissioners Board Chairman Andy Duyck announced that an earlier idea for a countywide tax measure to help fund housing alternatives is dead but that county officials are still exploring options for addressing the county's housing crisis.

     "I don't have any answers for you right now," Duyck said Monday, June 19, at a Washington County Public Affairs Forum luncheon. "But we cannot go in the direction we were thinking. Housing remains a top priority. We will continue to direct resources where we can to get the housing we need."

     RAD:  "I don't have any answers..."  But "we cannot go in the direction we were thinking..."  The county has no problem with aggressively supporting a public safety levy, a library levy and a road levy - why not a social sevices levy which includes housing, early childhood and workforce training? 

     The answer from the Board has been this is not our mission!  Huh?  This not an example of profiles in courage.  

     Duyck withheld judgment on a proposed ordinance that would govern in-fill development. The board has scheduled a public hearing on that issue Tuesday, July 11.

     Duyck has already announced he will not seek a third term as board chairman next year. He was the District 4 commissioner from western Washington County for 16 years until he was elected chairman in 2010.

      RAD:  Andy has had his day, it's time for new leadership at the top! 

     While restating many of the points he made at a "state of the county" address April 11, Duyck focused more on housing Monday.

     "Now, more than ever, I am convinced that the availability and affordability of housing consumes more attention and concern than just about any other issue we face," he said.

     "Housing has been a recurring issue among all of the mayors in their 'state of the city' addresses."

     Although Duyck listed a number of projects with county involvement — including the 236-unit Sunset View project in Beaverton — he quoted Cornelius Mayor Jef Dalin, who said: "It's like shaving ice from an iceberg; it's a small dent in a big problem."

     RAD:  So how does one get to the big problem?  There is only one answer - a combination of county, state and federal funding for affordable rental units across the county.  A $22 million per year levy would leverage for every county taxpayer dollar an additional $10-13 dollars from government and non-governmental entities.  

     Housing is one of three community goals identified by Washington County Thrives, a coalition of nonprofit groups and public agencies, including several county government departments. The others are early childhood and workforce training programs.

     RAD:  Thrives had a good idea but their leadership team bowed down to Andy et al.  Too many of Thrives members organizations are dependent on county support so biting the hand that feeds them is hard to do.

Cost and shortage

    Housing is deemed affordable, under a federal definition, if a person's rent or mortgage consumes less than 30 percent of their household income. But according to the 2017 budget message presented by County Administrator Robert Davis on May 9, almost 40,000 county households pay more than 30 percent.

     RAD:  For those who pay more than 30% for housing this means they have less for food, clothing, medical care.  And those who work at the minimum wage don't have the benefit of child care. Many such families depend on local food banks and/or charity from local churches.  

     By another measure, the county is more than 40,000 units short of housing, although development of 15,000 units is currently underway. 

       RAD:  The 15,000 units are market based developments not afforable for those whose incomes are 50% or less of medium familty incomes. 

     About 40 percent of county residents are renters.

     RAD:  This is the group who needs our help.  But the marketplace does not deliver a product which such families can afford - so they move further out in more rural areas, away from good paying jobs, cycle between renting and being at risk of homelessness.      

     Duyck said commissioners had been studying several proposals for housing that would have been supported by a countywide local-option levy of 34 cents per $1,000 of assessed value, about $86 annually for a home assessed at an average of $252,000.

     RAD:  I think most home owners in Washington County can afford another $86 per year to help those in need.  That's the cost of one ticket to a Mariner, Blazer or Quack game!  

     The levy would have helped pay the county's systems development charges — assessed on new construction for water and sewer lines, streets and parks — on housing projects developed by nonprofit groups.

      RAD:  Back in '93-94 when I chaired a county task force on affordable housing such "incentives" were considered necessary to attract the home building industry.  So why is this not a positive, Andy?  

     Duyck said commissioners were also willing to consider streamlining the permit process to speed approvals. And some money would have boosted existing programs that enable people to stay in their homes.

     RAD:  These have always been talking points in the county and in Salem for gaining support for such investments in housing.  So why wasn't this enough to move the board to a "yes"?  

     Duyck said federal aid for housing has declined in recent years — and the county is in danger of losing a big chunk of $2 million in community development block grants, which help pay for public works and other neighborhood improvements. The county administers the grants in all cities except Beaverton, which handles its own.

     RAD:  All the more reason for a county levy!  Again there is no "sticker" shock in $86 more per year!  Let's get real - that's NOT Andy's reason for saying "No."  

     Congress, however, has the final say on budget proposals by President Donald Trump.

     "We decided some time ago that we were going to have to deal with this ourselves and we could not rely on others," Duyck said. "We thought we had a path forward and we did some polling work to find out what the public mood was for a housing bond.

     "Unfortunately, when we did that polling, we found that the public mood is just not there to support it."

     RAD:  I analyzed the poll previously in my blog.  It suffers from serious methodological flaws and errors on demographic assumptions about who would vote.  But more importantly, unlike many such issues there is no public discussion of this issue - so an aggressive ground game would have a chance to move the dial on such a levy despite inevitable opposition for the construction and realestate lobby.

     If the levy was submitted in the November 2018 election, it would have a broader base of voters not just aged oldsters like moi but mellennials et al.  If it failed as the public safety levy did in 2005 - then supporters could re-tool their messaging to broaden their base as was done in 2006.  But Andy et al love cops, the board doesn't feel that way toward the poor.  

     Duyck said afterward that while a telephone survey indicated support, it was at just 52 percent — and consultants say that number should range in the 60s because support for a tax measure usually erodes before an election.

     RAD:  Correction the poll showed a range of support from 53-57%.  Again since there is no public visibility of such a levy at this time - a pro levy campaign could increase support since it doesn't come in with high negatives unlike many ballot measures.  But it would take "an all hands on board approach."  Clearly the message from the board is the majority of 3 on the board have "no will" to ge there.

     Check out my previous post on this issue: 


Critic of the state 

     Duyck did restate his criticism of recent state legislation.

     Lawmakers last year allowed inclusionary zoning — a requirement by local governments for developers to set aside below-market housing units — but only Portland has done so.

     "It's also been shown not to work well," Duyck said. "Market forces being what they are, if there's no profit in it, there's no construction."

     Lawmakers this session have considered allowing local rent control and banning no-cause evictions. But a Senate committee killed the rent control idea and the no-cause eviction ban might also be doomed.

     RAD:  Andy's opposition to inclusionary zoning tells us volumes about his values.  Studies have shown inclusionary zoning can and does work.  Andy doesn't know what he's talking about.  We allow mixed use development in our cities all the time - why not include housing in the mix?

     Yes the Oregon legislature despite Democratic majorities and a Democratic governor is walking away from what promised to be hopeful legislation.  There are too many Nike D's in the Puzzle Palace who buckle to the business lobby!  I see it all the time.  It's why I'm no longer spending my time in Salem.  

     But Salem's failure to act is a reason for leadership to show up in the county that considers itself to be "Oregon's economic engine." 

     What is needed is new leadership at the top.  And from press reports we'll have at least a 4 person race for the chairs seat in 2018.  Which of them will commit to this issue?  

     "They will not begin to address the root of the problem. In my view, the most effective way to provide affordable housing is to increase the supply of housing," Duyck said.

      RAD:  This is a totally bogus argument.  There is NO evidence the market will build low income housing.  And without inclusionary zoning which Andy opposes, there is even less chance for this to happen. 

     The next argument out of the No tool box is that our urban growth boundary (UGB) which protects urban/rural reserves is an obstacle to home building.  All the condo and home construction in the county gives the lie to that talking point.     

     "Well-intended proposals that focus solely on keeping low-income populations in decent housing do nothing to increase that supply. Unfortunately, many of the regulatory initiatives being proposed by leaders will have just the opposite effect and they will decrease the focus on increasing the supply."

     RAD:  Andy speaks like a supply side true believer.  So all I can assume is that his trist with the idea of a levy was simply smoke and mirrors.  Short of an act of God  - this was a bridge to nowhere.  Andy has never changed his view - not once!  Hopefully with a new chair the mood music will change in Hillsboro. 



EDITOR'S NOTE:  Found this excellent op ed in our local Forest Grove News Times. 

By Rubi Vergara-Grindell a 2015 graduate of Forest Grove High School. She will be a junior at Reed College in Portland next fall.

     Today citizenship is used to draw the line between rightful members of United States society and the 'illegal aliens,' criminalizing and incarcerating those who are not protected by citizenship.

     Ana Maria's (name changed) lips tremble as she tells me about her seven-year old daughter who asks where her mother is every night. A couple of years ago, Ana Maria's husband was deported and now her daughter's worst fear has come true — her mother is in detention and will probably be deported as well.

     Ana Maria has been living in Arizona for over 10 years and her only criminal charges are two DUIs. If she were an American citizen, these DUI's may have meant that she would have gone to jail for a few months and then returned to her life.

     As an undocumented person, these charges make her a priority for deportation and separation from her daughter. Ana Maria can apply for cancellation of removal, but in order to qualify for this legal remedy, she must prove that her daughter would suffer "extreme hardship" if separated from her mother.

     When I explain this, Ana Maria quickly tells me how her daughter was traumatized by her father's deportation and now cries every day for her mother to come home. This may seem like "extreme hardship" to any mother or daughter, but in the eyes of the law, it does not count. Only a severe medical condition or complete dependency qualifies under "extreme hardship." Most probably, Ana Maria will be deported, leaving her daughter without parents.

     Instead of being able to care for her daughter, Ana Maria is detained in the Eloy Detention Center in Eloy, Arizona, along with approximately 1,500 other undocumented people, from presenting asylum seekers to longtime residents of the U.S. Legally speaking, detention is not incarceration and according to Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), is simply to insure that detainees will attend their immigration court hearings.

     One look at the Eloy Detention Center, a private prison run by CoreCivic (formerly CCA), will tell you differently. In terms of legal rights, detainees do not have many of those that defendants in criminal court do. Under immigration law, defendants do not have the right to legal counsel nor the right to be tried by a jury.

     Defendants, many of whom do not speak English, are expected not only to represent themselves but also submit all documents in English and receive all paper rulings in English. There is no Internet access in the detention center and phone calls are costly. For indigenous language speakers, court hearings often get pushed back many times due to the court's inability to find an interpreter.

     It is not uncommon for people to be detained for multiple years. In order to get out on bond, defendants must provide extensive proof of their good moral conduct and prove that they are not a flight risk, then pay a bond that can range from the minimum of $1,500 to as much as $40,000 or more.

     Meanwhile, the conditions of detention are far from humane. A 2015 report by The Republic showed that the Eloy Detention Center has had more deaths than any other detention center in the country — 15 since 2003. People in detention, just like in any other kind of incarceration, can suffer severe mental trauma, what Eloy's medical staff call "adjustment disorder." Detention severely affects the families of those detained as well.

     Tomás (name changed), a young man from Guatemala, presented himself at the border with his pregnant wife in order to ask for asylum from persecution in his home country. His wife is on parole in Washington, but he will remain in Eloy for at least six months awaiting a bond hearing and more if he is denied bond. His first child will be born thousands of miles away from the prison that he sits in.

     The United States detains 380,000 to 442,000 persons per year in immigration detention. More than 60 percent of these people are detained in privately-run immigration detention centers like the Eloy Detention Center. Detention is costly. Detaining and deporting one person costs $23,000. In 2015, taxpayers paid about $2 billion dollars to fund immigration detention.

     Detention is not only expensive but unnecessary and inhumane. Those detained are not criminals, and if they have committed crimes, they have already served their sentences in criminal detention.

     Undocumented people are not a risk to American society. According to a report by the CATO institute, "the chance of being murdered in an attack committed by an illegal immigrant is an astronomical 1 in 10.9 billion per year. Every single person detained could just as easily go through immigration proceedings outside of detention and in that way continue to contribute to our economy and communities.

     Why not immigrate "the right way"? Contrary to popular opinion, immigrating "legally" to the United States is impossible for many people. Millions of people fleeing violence and persecution from Latin American countries such as El Salvador, Honduras, Guatemala and Mexico (all among the top 13 most dangerous countries in the world according to the major risk-consultancy firm Verisk Maplecroft) cannot apply for refugee status in their home countries and must present themselves at the U.S. border in order to ask for asylum.

     At the border they are most often detained in immigration detention just like any person who crosses through the desert. There is even an incentive to enter without inspection as you can more easily bond out of detention than if you present at the border. For immigration proceedings that can occur outside of the U.S, such as adjustment of status through a U.S. citizen child, parent or sibling, the waiting list is extremely long taking more than 20 years in many cases.

     Why is such a cruel and ineffective system being utilized?

     This question points back to the origins of U.S. citizenship and the ways it has been used to include and exclude. Citizenship is a social construct that has been used since the creation of the United States to delineate between the white citizen and the non-white anti-citizen.

     The Naturalization Act of 1790 restricted citizenship to any "free white person," leaving out enslaved and free people of color. Black Americans were denied citizenship for over a century in order to justify their enslavement and oppression. Native Americans were similarly denied citizenship until 1924.

     Today, citizenship is used to draw the line between rightful members of United States society and the "illegal aliens," criminalizing and incarcerating those who are not protected by citizenship. Coincidentally, these "illegal aliens" are by far people of color. Fleeing persecution, domestic violence, extortion, gang violence and economic instability (often caused by U.S. military and economic intervention in foreign countries) should not be a crime. Today it is and thousands of people sit in jail because of it.

     Practical steps to protecting victims of the immigration system include raising awareness about the injustice of immigration detention, putting oneself in contact with local nonprofits that advocate for immigrant rights, writing letters of support to people in detention through legal aid organizations and asking local and state officials to support legislation in favor of undocumented rights.




    The news cycle during the campaign was all about Trump’s megalomania, narcissism, sexism,  vulgar rhetoric and hostility to minorities – Latinos, Muslims and Blacks. 

     Since occupying the Oval Office the focus has become the Putin/Trump connection and the possible treasonable actions of colluding with the Russians in manipulating the election in Trump’s favor. 

     I share all of these concerns of Trump and Trumpism. I expect that he and his minions will be found to have stolen the election and in the process obstructed justice – impeachable acts. 

     As these charges work their way through the Congress, the Courts, a special counsel’s investigation and the court of public opinion – there is another damaging affect of Trump – the sheer incompetence of his governance style or lack thereof. 

     As of late February there were 2000 vacancies in the new administration not requiring legislative confirmation. Bureaucratic desks are empty to carry out daily administrative functions of government.

     Many have warned us of Trump’s lack of any previous political experience.  Many have noted his ignorance of the Constitution and his disrespect for our checks and balances system

     Many have shared their concerns for his lack of discipline, his ignorance and disdain for information other than what he gets from social media and his constant often inconsistent and incoherent tweeting. 

     Every week there are informed rumors of verbal battles among White House staffers and shake-ups within the administration as dissension grows.  All the while Trump keeps tweeting that he is in charge!  

     One of the most important responsibilities of a president is to appoint people around him he can trust and who have the strength to tell him things he may not want to hear. 

     The implicit job description of White House staff, cabinet members and others in key positions in the administration is that they understand how Washington works. They are experienced.  

     Few of Trump’s team have such experience and it has shown with the incredibly messy attempt at repealing and replacing Obamacare and with developing a tax plan.  

     Trump ran a campaign of chaos – apparently he thinks he can govern by chaos. But he can’t.  The prerequisites for effective governance are clarity of mission and coherency of a legislative game plan. 

     Thus far Trump has not demonstrated such a governance skill set.  He’s done the opposite – he’s increased uncertainty while railing on about how “he’s” going to make “America Great Again.” 

     Trump is like a modern day Casey Jones at the throttle heading his steam engine down the tracks at full bore with the brakeman not on duty.  This is a prescription for failure not success and Americans will suffer from such irresponsible behavior.    

     A president has many audiences – the public, the Congress, the lobby, the international community and the media here and abroad. To be successful he has to know how to relate to each. Thus far Trump has shown himself to be tone deaf to these audiences other than his rabid minority base.    

     Crafting legislation is a Congressional responsibility – as the saying goes – “the president proposes, the congress disposes.”  Trump doesn’t seem to understand this basic rule of governance.  

     Trump’s lack of governance skills will ultimately leave him alone in the White House isolated from those whose help  - various publics noted above - he needs to persuade in order to govern.

    Without a coherent agenda coming from the Oval Office – these various audiences will go their separate ways making sure that chaos reigns – not a prescription for good governance.  

     Trump prides himself as a “transactional” leader who at the last minute can sweep into a room to make the “big deal.”  That’s not the way that democratic government works at any level – at home or in the international community. 

     Governance requires collaboration and consent not force nor intimidation.  

     At the end of the day Trump’s approach to governance will lead us into a dystopian nation and world described by Thomas Hobbes as “the war of all against all.” 

     Welcome to Donald Trump’s brave new world.